Coaching Improv
This past Sunday evening I had my first rehearsal as the coach of ITC’s newest Incubator team, Dirty Little Secret. It’s good to be coaching again and working with a group of talent up and coming improvisers who are eager to improve and get better and better. I love coaching, I love teaching and I’m excited to help these guys along with their growth — which I could already see within the three-hour span of that rehearsal.
One of the subjects I’ve been asked a lot about over the years is coaching improv. Over the last three years — since we established a three-tier system to our teams (Incubator, Harold and House teams) — that question has been asked more and more. What is the role of an improv coach? To answer that, I first want to address the nomenclature of improv “teams” and why those teams have “coaches.”
The idea of improv teams, as it relates to longform improv, came out of the iO Theater in Chicago at a time when it was known as ImprovOlympic. The improv Olympics performed at that theatre consisted of different teams competing in different scene events. (The Canadian Improv Games are actually built on this old IO show format.) Charna Halpern has talked about how she created the idea of coaches to help facilitate an environment in which experienced and new improvisers interact with other and build a support system for young teams. When the games at ImprovOlympic stopped and Del Close came on board as artistic director, short-form teams became Harold teams.
At the Impatient Theatre Co. we used to just have Harold teams. Even though it was clear which teams had more experience and were working better as teams, there was only one level. We created the hierarchy to provide a distinction in the level of experience that a team — and/or its players — has. Some people don’t like this, but it actually has significant developmental benefits for the teams, which is an entirely different post.
Allow me to quickly outline our team structure...
Incubator Teams: At the ITC we take the term incubator fairly literally and use it to suggest that teams at this level are still young and going through a more rigidly defined process of development and learning to perform Harold well.
Harold Teams: These teams (and/or their players) have experience performing Harold from the ITC approach. Often Harold teams are incubator teams that have been elevated to Harold status through hard work and practice. Sometimes this can take a year or more of performing at the incubator level.
House Teams: A house team is a featured team at the ITC and performs regularly and might even have their own weekly show. Big In Japan and DHARMA are ITC’s two current house teams. Each team headlines one of our two weekly Harold Night shows (both of which currently take place on Tuesday nights). Big In Japan performs Harold; DHARMA performs something akin to 4 Square, very organic and highly transformational.
As you can imagine, since the quality of experience, development and skill of the teams and its players varies from team level to team level, so does the role of the coach vary from level to level.
Coaching at the Incubator Level
When coaching an incubator team, it is the coach’s job, role, responsibility to hammer into the incubator team the ITC approach to performing Harold. For this reason, the coach’s role is more akin to that of a director, where the team members have little say with regard to their objectives.
Teams at this level are typically fresh out of our training centre and, while they may have spent a lot of time coming up through classes with each other, they haven’t had a significant amount of experience performing Harold — four months at best subsequent to their IMPROV 401 classes. Since Harold isn’t something that can be taught in only eight weeks of class, there are two more levels of intermediate and advanced organic and conceptual approaches to the work.
The team will likely spend an inordinate amount of time running scene drills and practicing organic openings until they want to die. The incubator team is not focused on finding its own voice or style or unique difference that separates it from the rest of the teams. In fact, the goal should be just the opposite. The coach works to — for lack of a better term — beat the concepts of longform improv and Harold into the team until they become intuitive and instinctual, when they can stop thinking and start playing. It’s not until the team can break away from the shackles of the training wheels Harold’s underlying framework and become more organic with it that they’ll truly start to become a team unto themselves.
This whole process for incubator teams can take a long period of time, frequently upwards of a year. In the meantime, incubator teams are being coached at least once a week and performing on a regular basis — currently incubator teams perform two out of every three weeks. This process has significant advantages for the development of teams and players as both are able to relax and focus on their growth in a structured non-competitive environment for extended periods of time where they are held to little in the way of performance expectations. It is not imperative that incubator teams consistently perform good shows, only that they are working steadily and that growth can be seen in their work over an extended period of time.
Coaching at the Harold Level
When working with a Harold team, the coach becomes much more symbiotic with the team. It is common for teams to change coaches once they reach this level to get a fresh pair of eyes on their work. Harold teams have proven that they understand and can implement the concepts of longform improvisation, but more importantly that the group has become a unified and cohesive team.
At this level, teams are encouraged to start finding and developing their own unique team voice. The coach helps them do that but still retains a great degree of influence over their work by bringing new ideas and approaches to the team for experimentation and by providing the “outside eye” POV on the work that every team needs.
The coach is not there to rule or dictate, but to challenge and push the team to discover the best they can be and to stage the best performances they can rally. When I coached Big In Japan, I spent six months with the team working almost exclusively on organic openings. We ran openings many different ways, highly narrative one month, highly physical the next, and switched it up from month to month to month until they were able to take all of those approaches and use them as weapons in their openings and throughout their show from a level that was instinctual, intuitive and often awe-inspiring.
Coaching at the House Level
This is the purest role of the coach at the Impatient Theatre Co. The coach of a house team is there to serve the needs and desires of the team. Kind of like the navigator on a ship. The team determines the destination, the coach figures out the best route to get them there.
While house teams consist of some of the best players in the company, the coach is still ever pushing the team forward. The coach may develop exercises that push players out of their comfort zones or focus on areas of weakness or areas in which the team or its players have let slide while they spent time focusing on other skills. Still having some influence over the direction of the team, the coach’s primary task is to gain understanding of what the team wants and how to guide them down that path.
So, that’s a cursory glance at the role of the coach at each improv team level at ITC. I could go in-depth on each one of these levels but that would be a topic for another post some day.
I’m excited to be working with this young team and providing them with the tools they need to succeed at this wonderful art form they’ve all chosen to take part in. Keep pushing forward. Keeping working at the craft and challenge yourself always. Quo vadimus?
I find that coaching is also a great way to learn about and reinforce my own improv skills.
Game changing blog post sir. Thank you!
Thanks, Jim. Caldwell wanted to talk to me about this by phone, likely so she could relay it back to you. Feel free to call me anytime. I like the idea of splinter teams, as well.